SupercitedVerified Matter
Ricardo Moncada v. Nuna Baby Essentials, Inc.
Motion to dismiss denied; consumer fraud claims proceed
Denlea & Carton LLP represented the plaintiff in a consumer class action involving the Nuna Rava convertible car seat. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York denied the defendant's motion to dismiss, allowing core consumer fraud claims under New York General Business Law §§ 349 and 350 to proceed.
Result
- Outcome
- Other
- Short result
- Motion to dismiss denied; consumer fraud claims proceed
- Year
- 2026
- Published
- 2026-09-02
Supporting sources
- Opinion and Order, Moncada v. Nuna Baby Essentials, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2026) · Court opinion
- Denlea & Carton secures key ruling advancing claims over defective Nuna Rava car seat · News / public announcement
- Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) · Statute / rule
- New York General Business Law § 349 · N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349 · Statute / rule
- New York General Business Law § 350 · N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 350 · Statute / rule