Case study

Ricardo Moncada v. Nuna Baby Essentials, Inc., Motion to Dismiss Denied

The Court Finds Core Consumer Fraud Claims Can Move Forward

Denlea & Carton LLP secured a significant federal court ruling allowing core consumer fraud claims to proceed in litigation involving the Nuna Rava convertible car seat — a premium-priced product marketed for its advanced features and rigorous product safety testing. In Ricardo Moncada v. Nuna Baby Essentials, Inc., the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (decision attached) denied Nuna’s motion to dismiss, preserving the central claims that the Rava car seat did not perform as represented.